Teaching the Mixed-Level Pointe Class: Management Strategies for Safety and Success

Let's address the elephant in the studio: some ballet teachers will tell you that combining pointe levels is a sign you lack integrity. That if you were a truly good teacher, you'd refuse to do it.

The economic reality at non-ballet-academies tells a different story. Sometimes the only way to offer pointe at all—financially, logistically, practically—is to combine levels. So the real question isn't whether combining levels is ideologically pure. The real question is: Can you do this safely?

And that's deeply personal. Not "can teachers in general combine pointe levels safely," but can YOU, specifically, keep YOUR students safe and their technical habits clean in a combined-level setting? This year? With these particular dancers?

The Decision Framework: Safety First

Before you decide to combine pointe levels, you need honest answers to some uncomfortable questions.

Do your students respond well to differentiated instruction, or will you have dancers attempting skills they're not ready for because they see someone else doing them? And I don't mean your students in general—I mean the specific dancers who would be in this particular combined class.

It's tempting to make generalizations based on past experience. "I combined levels last year and it went fine, so I can do it again." But every year brings different students with different dynamics, different maturity levels, different technical foundations. You need to evaluate annually, not assume.

If you decide to move forward, you need to make a commitment to yourself: safety is the top priority. Not "if I don't offer this class, students will go to another studio." Not "parents are expecting this." Safety first, always.

And you need to decide upfront that if the answer shifts from "yes, I can do this safely" to "no, this isn't working" at any point during the year—even after four months of success—you'll discontinue the combined class. This level of safety prioritization should accompany every pointe class, but the added complexity of combining levels makes it absolutely non-negotiable.

How Many Levels Are You Actually Managing?

Once you've decided you can teach a combined pointe class safely with your specific students, the next question is: how many levels are you dealing with?

Two adjacent levels (like Level 1 and Level 2, or Level 2 and Level 3): You can keep students together the entire class time. The technical gap is manageable, exercises can be modified appropriately, and you can maintain everyone's safety and progress.

Three or more levels, or two non-adjacent levels (like Level 2 and Level 4): You need to stagger the class. This is key for safety and effectiveness.

Here's what staggering looks like in practice: If you're teaching three levels, some students come from 7:00-8:00, others from 7:30-8:30. You're only managing the large technical gap simultaneously for 30 minutes, which is the maximum you can expect to have bandwidth to maintain safety and quality instruction in such a complex situation.

Critical detail: Start with your less advanced dancers. When the more advanced students arrive, they join work that's already in progress. If you start with advanced students, you'll be combining the most challenging part of your advanced dancers' class with the beginning of your less advanced group's work. Level 3 center combinations don't pair well with Level 1 barre work.

You have to choose where to place your middle level—either they start with the less advanced group or arrive with the more advanced group. Either way, you'll be teaching combination A and variation B all night. It's just a question of where dancers will be best served.

If you're doing a 90-minute class structured as two overlapping 60-minute sections, the second group MUST be coming straight from another class so they're already warm. Trying to warm up one group while maintaining the first group's momentum doesn't work. And being properly warmed up for pointe class is a safety issue, not a preference.

Having a set warm-up sequence that students know and can execute independently is essential. They need to be able to start without you teaching it fresh every time.

Prioritizing Content: What Cannot Give

Once you've solved the scheduling puzzle, you need to figure out what's most critical for each level. I'd love to think everything I teach is essential and every exercise I create is brilliant, but when you're combining classes, something has to give. So start by determining what cannot give.

This is where having a comprehensive curriculum becomes invaluable. I'm teaching a 3-levels-in-one class for the first time this year, and having the Geeky Ballerina Pointe Curriculum has been essential—I don't think I could manage this level of organization without that framework. The key principle and key vocabulary for each unit are clearly identified, which makes prioritization possible.

Here's what I do: For each level I'm teaching, I list what cannot give, then what ideally won't give. The key principle and the key vocabulary (or progression toward it) can't be compromised. New vocabulary is ideal to include, but if it needs to give, that just means I'll move through the curriculum more slowly. I'll take two months to teach Unit 5 instead of one, rather than rushing through most of Unit 5 in a month and moving to Unit 6 just because the calendar says to.

I have to work this out on paper—my brain can't handle doing it on screen. So for each level, I list the cannot-gives and ideally-won't-gives. I go through my lesson plans and highlight those exercises. Then I make a post-it note for myself with the order I want to cover things that night.

For example: Level 1 barre highlighted exercises →

Level 2 barre highlighted exercises (adapted for Level 1 students) →

Level 2 center highlighted exercises (Level 1 uses demi-pointe or changes into technique shoes) →

Level 3 center highlighted exercises →

Level 3 barre highlighted exercises.

When Traditional Class Structure Doesn't Work

Is it strange to finish at the barre for Level 3? Yes, it feels unusual. And I may find a better approach as I continue teaching, but for now this is what keeps everyone safe and progressing.

Those Level 3 dancers come in and do a well-designed warm-up and short conditioning sequence at the barre—they're already warm from their previous class—then move into center work. My brain can manage Level 1 at the barre while Level 2 works in center, but something about Level 3 barre work throws me off. I find myself over-explaining and talking too much, which means students get cold (a safety issue) and don't progress well.

So I've adjusted. Because safety is priority one and progress matters, I typically teach a lower unit for center work and the most appropriate barre unit for these dancers. I'll do Unit 4 center combinations with Unit 5 barre work, so that I'm sure the dancers have mastered the proper preparatory exercises before introducing new vocabulary in the center.

This isn't what traditional ballet pedagogy recommends. But traditional ballet pedagogy was designed for ideal circumstances. It was written by teachers who work(ed) in pre-professional ballet academies. It doesn't always translate directly into competition or recreational studios. So sometimes we adapt based on what keeps students safe and learning, not what looks most conventional.

The Annual Re-Evaluation

Remember that initial question: Can you do this safely? It's not a one-time decision. Every year, with every new group of students, you ask it again.

Maybe you taught combined pointe successfully for three years. That doesn't mean this year's group can handle it. Maybe you've never combined levels before, but this year's dancers have the maturity and body awareness to make it work. Every group is different.

The controversy around combined pointe classes will continue. Some teachers will insist it's never appropriate. They have valid concerns about safety and technical development. Others will point to economic realities and the choice between offering combined classes or offering no pointe at all.

But the only opinion that matters for your studio is your honest assessment: Can I keep these specific students safe and progressing in a combined setting? If the answer is yes, you have strategies to make it work. If the answer is no, or if it shifts to no mid-year, you have the integrity to make a different choice.

Teaching combined pointe levels isn't about whether you're a good teacher with high standards. It's about whether you can maintain those high standards—especially safety—within the constraints of your specific situation. Only you can answer that question.

---

Get monthly ballet teaching insights, join the newsletter →

Explore the Geeky Ballerina curricula for technique and artistry →